One of those season 3 episodes of Trek which went for high concept and floating historical person in space over pacing and logic.
No curtains either, savage or regular.
It’s memorable, but mostly for the ‘good vs evil’ battle element. I can’t say it’s bad, I don’t skip any parts when watching, but it is resolved in a depressingly expected way compared to other episodes, like ‘The Corbomite Manouvre’, where the resolution is clever and ultimately the alien enemy is not a bad guy, he’s just lonely.
Also, unlike ‘The Spectre of the Gun’, there’s nothing distinctive about the scenery.
It’s simply good guys vs bad guys.
But then the more I think about it, the less sense it makes.
The biggest problem I had when re-watching it was the use of Kahless as a representation of ‘evil’. In TNG and DS9, the Klingons revere Kahless and see him as a liberator from tyranny. His eating of his enemy’s heart is very much in line with Klingon customs, so that’s not really evil, and he established the ‘honour system’, which has some dubious elements i.e. the punishment of the father’s sins on seven generations of that family, but is basically a worthy code.
Therefore, the fact that Kahless is featured at all, raises two questions in my mind.
i] The aliens took the historical figures from the minds of Kirk & Spock, so did they know a lot about Kahless, or was it their general dislike of Klingons that caused him to pop up here? Continue reading