Not a series of reviews.

More of an attempt to grapple with experimental work that is often neglected and understand what’s going on.

I’ll try to do at least one each month, probably on a wednesday, but other things may get in the way so no guarantees.

Basic methodology:

Examine context/premise.

Go through the text and see what flows and what jars, which lines spark some kind of reaction.

Try to pull out the allusions, intended by the author or invented by myself.

Head off on tangents.

Speculate what the meaning might be.

Stop about thirty pages into the text to avoid spoilers.

I am not an expert, or an academic, or even anchored in reality half the time, so a lot of this could be way off.

But could also be way on too.